[Home] [How to Measure Your Beliefs] [The Man-Made Church] [Miscellaneous]

[Home]>[Miscellaneous]>[9. The stupidity of scientists]>[ 2. Scientific American (1) July 2018]

Previous webpage:           1. Der Standard (1) 25.08.2018
To the end of this webpage: End
Next webpage:               3. Der Standard (2) 27.12.2017

 

2. Scientific American (1) July 2018

 

Frank L. Preuss

Here I bring extracts from the magazine Scientific American, from the July 2018 edition.

First come extracts from an article with the heading "Crossing the Quantum Divide". The subtitle is "Where is the line between the quantum and classical worlds?" The author is Tim Folger.

These extracts I bring, because they contain a good description of quantum mechanics.

So now therefore these extracts.

 

Page 21
The universe according to quantum mechanics is strange and probabilistic, but our everyday reality seems nailed down.

Page 22

Folger

Page 22

The microscopic and macroscopic worlds do not blend seamlessly: the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics reigns over the first, whereas the second observes more logical "classical" rules.

Page 22
Can a single macroscopic object be in two places at once? Could something the size of a pinhead, say, exist both here and there at the same time? That seemingly impossible condition is actually the norm for atoms, photons and all other particles. According to the surreal laws of quantum theory, reality at its most basic level defies our commonsense assumptions: Particles do not have fixed positions, energies or any other definite properties — at least while no one is looking. They exist in numerous states simultaneously. But for reasons physicists do not understand, the reality we see is different.

Page 22
The measurement problem.
For all its paradoxes, quantum mechanics is the most powerful and exacting scientific theory ever devised. The theory's predictions match experiment with ridiculous precision — to better than parts-per-trillion accuracy in some cases. By revolutionizing our understanding of atomic structure, it transformed every facet of science, from biology to astrophysics. Without quantum theory, there would be no electronics industry, no cell phones, no Google. Yet the theory has one glaring shortcoming, says Stephen L. Adler, a theoretical physicist at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J.: "In quantum mechanics, things don't happen."

Page 23
Separate Realms
Quantum mechanics produces some bizarre effects in the microscopic world, but we do not see these phenomena in our macroscopic, "classical" reality. Why is that? Scientists have never understood why and how the universe crosses over between these realms, but several theories, as depicted here, offer possible explanations.


Quantum vs. Classical
According to quantum mechanics, particles do not exist in definite states — here or there, having this energy or that — but rather take on all possible states and positions. The theory describes particles with equations called wave functions, which are combinations, or "superpositions," of multiple waves. The amplitude of each peak in a wave function denotes the probability of a particle being found in any specific circumstances — for instance, at point A or B, as shown.

Strangely, when scientists make a measurement of a particle, this act appears to reduce all the quantum possibilities to one, seemingly chosen at random. The experiment will find the particle at point A, for example, and the particle enters the classical realm, ceasing to be in a superposition.

Collapse at Measurement
One theory for how the universe crosses over from quantum to classical is that the act of measurement intervenes. Particles can linger in quantum superpositions (dotted yellow lines) as long as no one looks too closely, but once humans make a measurement, the particle is forced to "choose" a specific state (solid red lines). How this happens, and why human measurement should take on such a significance in physics, remains mystifying.

Decoherence
Another theory posits that a particle's environment is to blame for moving it from the quantum world to the classical. As long as a particle is undisturbed by any outside influence, so the thinking goes, it can remain in superposition. But when the wave functions of other particles or objects nearby meet with its own, they interfere, causing the particle's many quantum possibilities to collapse into a single classical reality.

Continuous Spontaneous Localization
Another possibility is that the collapse of the wave function to a single possibility is a random event, not caused by human or environmental interference. The chances of any one particle collapsing at any given time are extremely small, but in macroscopic objects containing multitudes of atoms, the collapse of at least one is inevitable, which then causes the entire structure to collapse.

Page 24
Adler's cryptic comment refers to what the basic equations of quantum theory say — or do not say — about the nature of reality. Known as wave functions, the equations assign probabilities to an object's chances of being found in various states. Unlike Newtonian physics, where apples, planets and everything else always have well-defined properties, quantum physics is inherently probabilistic. In a sense, particles that are described by wave functions cannot even be said to fully exist; they have no fixed locations, speeds or energies — only probabilities. But everything changes when scientists take a measurement. Then real, tangible properties arise, as if conjured up by merely attempting to observe them. Not only does the theory not say why measurements bring about this transformation - it does not tell us why one of those many possibilities manifests instead of others. Quantum mechanics describes what might happen as the outcome of a measurement but not what will happen. In other words, the theory provides no mechanism for the transition from the probable to the actual.

To "make things happen" in quantum mechanics, one of the theory's legendary founders argued for an almost metaphysical hack. In the late 1920s Werner Heisenberg formulated and spread the notion that the very act of measurement makes the wave function of a particle "collapse" — the many potential outcomes instantaneously reduce to a single observed result. The only flaw with the idea is that there is nothing in the equations of quantum theory that says a collapse occurs or offers a physical process to explain it. Heisenberg's "solution" essentially introduced a new mystery into physics: What exactly happens when a wave function collapses? That quantum conundrum is now known as the measurement problem.

Physicists may have gotten used to the collapse idea over the past 90 years, but they have never really liked it. The notion that a human action — measurement — plays a central role in our most fundamental theory of how the universe works does not sit well with anyone partial to the concept of an objective reality.

"Fundamentally, I have an ideal of what a physical theory should be," says Nobel laureate physicist Steven Weinberg of the University of Texas at Austin. (Weinberg serves on Scientific American's board of advisers.) "It should be something that doesn't refer in any specific way to human beings. It should be something from which everything else — including anything you can say systematically about chemistry, or biology, or human affairs — can be derived. It shouldn't have human beings at the beginning in the laws of nature. And yet I don't see any way of formulating quantum mechanics without an interpretive postulate that refers to what happens when people choose to measure one thing or another thing."

Choose your interpretation

One sleight-of-hand way out of the measurement problem is to assume that collapse simply does not happen. In the early 1970s H. Dieter Zeh, now an emeritus professor at the University of Heidelberg in Germany, proposed a process that yields the appearance of collapse while preserving the full quantum multiplicity of the wave function. In the real world, Zeh argued, the wave function of any particular object becomes hopelessly enmeshed with that of everything else in its environment, making it impossible to keep track of all the countless quantum interactions going on around us. In quantum parlance, the wave functions become "entangled" - a special kind of correlation that preserves connectedness even over huge distances. An observer can only ever hope to look at a single small part of that vast entangled system, so any particular measurement captures just a sliver of the quantum world.

Zeh called this process "decoherence," and it has become the go-to explanation among physicists for why we do not witness quantum phenomena on a macroscopic level. It describes how an intact wave function — which comprises all the possible physical states a particle might have — decoheres as it mingles with the wave functions of other quantum systems around it. If the decoherence model is right, we ourselves live among the strands of that entangled quantum web but see only part of it.

Not all physicists believe that decoherence settles the measurement problem. For one thing, it still fails to explain why we see one strand of the quantum web and not others. "You still have to invoke the collapse postulate, which takes an entangled state and says that one of those possible states has to be selected, and that is usually done by fiat," says Miles P. Blencowe, a theoretical physicist at Dartmouth College. For Blencowe and others, the process does not capture the way we experience things. "I believe we have this one world that is evolving," he says. "How do you go from an entangled state to this perception of the world as always finding one unique path into the future? Many quantum mechanicians would feel that there needs to be a collapse to restore this oneness about the world as it evolves rather than this web of entanglement that keeps enlarging." Adler's assessment of decoherence is more blunt: "It doesn't supply a mechanism [for collapse] at all. It doesn't solve the problem, period."

Six decades ago a doctoral candidate at Princeton University proposed an even more radical solution to the collapse problem. In his 1957 Ph.D. thesis, Hugh Everett argued that the wave function neither collapses nor decoheres. Rather all its components are physically real, parts of an endlessly branching panoply of universes. Everett's "many worlds" interpretation, as it is called, has become popular among cosmologists, who have other reasons to think we might inhabit a multiverse. But no one has ever

Page 25
managed to experimentally distinguish the many-worlds idea from standard quantum theory.

So these now were the extracts from this article "Crossing the Quantum Divide" in the Scientific American.

The solution to the collapse problem, so Hugh Everett, is that all the components of the wave function are parts of an endless branching panoply of universes.

A panoply is a complete or splendid array. And an array is an imposing series.

So the components of the wave function are parts of an endless branching, complete or splendid imposing series of universes.

"One of those possible states has to be selected, and that is usually done by fiat," says Miles P. Blencowe.

It is done by fiat.

Now fiat is authorization, decree, order. It is "Let it be done."

So it is jumping from one universe to another and it is done by speaking: "Let it be done."

So here we are back at the beginning of this website, and that is the first book brought on this website and the title is "How to Measure Your Beliefs."

And there it is about creation and how we, as creatures created in the image of God, create like God created and creates and do that by speaking.

We have before us an endless branching, complete or splendid imposing series of universes and we create the next one by fiat.

Our whole life is a test. Again and again we are put into situations, where we have to make a decision. And to pass the test, we have to make the right decision. And the right decision is to do good. The wrong decision is to do bad.

Let me give you an idea how this thing works. I want to let you have this explanation from him, who designed and created it.

Plan of salvation based on free will.

11. February 1951. B.D. NR. 5060.

My plan of salvation is fixed from eternity, but it is based on the free will of man. But not that I determine the human will to bring it into line with my plan from eternity, but I fit it into the free will of man; it therefore unwinds according to this will. Because I know about it for eternities, how it will be such at the end of this redemption period despite favourable influence and all possibilities for a change of will. In no way I have a determining influence. Perfect freest will results in all events on this earth. Not arbitrarily does everything unwind in the whole universe, but on my wisdom is everything based, which directs everything to lead all entities to a high development if possible, to reach a change of will, which is purpose and aim of earth life. Even the knowledge on my part about the failure of earth life for so innumerable souls does not hinder the scheduled course of the individual redemption periods, because the souls must come to a certain decision, although they also fail and must exhaust a new possibility to once reach the aim. Free will causes such possibilities, which I very well recognized for eternity and for that reason the development course of every individual soul is provided for down to the smallest detail according to purpose, notwithstanding the success. For I cannot determine the success, although I know about it, when I want to know it. But for me eternity is like a moment, and what is not achieved in one development period, can be achieved in again and again repeated development phases, but it must always happen regularly, because free will is not to be eliminated, but as also my love and wisdom can never withdraw or hide and this creates again and again the most favourable possibilities, to develop free will in the right way. The plan of salvation pursues the redemption of the souls only and their return to me – when I achieve the aim, is without importance for me, but for you extremely important, because for you men, as long as you are still imperfect, the idea of time plays a part, you therefore can endless long time be in an unhappy state and you therefore must live through times of suffering, which are finished with the moment of the redemption of your soul, of the healing, for which my plan for eternity is meant and which I would like to promote continually, when your will does not resists me. The process of healing can be extremely lengthy; but it can also take place in a short time, what, however, you yourselves determine. And no matter if I also know about the success or failure, so this still does not determine my plan of salvation from eternity, because I am unchangeable for ever, and what my wisdom has once recognized as right, that my love power will also carry out, because it irrevocably leads to the aim, even so eternities go by over it. The world will once be redeemed, and all entities will be united with me, because nothing can resist my love for ever. Amen. B.D. NR. 5060.

It is the evolution of the soul. And it is not the evolution of the body. That is nonsense.

And that is the reason why evolution, the evolution of the body, is propagated again and again, by the stupid scientists, by the god of this world, to keep man to decide for bad.

With every decision, might it be right or wrong, we put ourselves into a new situation, into a new universe, and the possibilities are endless. As soon as we have arrived in the new one, the preparation for the next decision making situation starts to be created.

It is always finding one unique path into the future. Exactly as Blencowe says.

When we create, then we create physical things from spiritual things. Out of the spiritual world physical worlds are created. The wave function has infinite many possibilities.

Now this connection between the creating of material things from spiritual things, on one side, and the mechanics of quantum mechanics, on the other side, is so obvious, why is it then that the scientists are not falling over this obvious conclusion?

It is because of them saying "There is no God."

A man who says this, makes a fool out of himself. And a fool is a stupid person. So here we are back at our subject, the stupidity of scientists. The stupidity of scientists is based on a quite important principle of spiritual teachings.

"They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good."

And why is it that they are against this truth?

They do not want to do good.

They want to leave God out of their equation. And that is why their equation does not make sense to them. They do not understand it.

And when a man now stands up and acts as the main representative of the god of this world, and becomes the world leader, then they believe that now finally their ideas have won the victory.

And when now the American people decide to make an end to the rule of this man, and elect a man as their leader, who has the guts to attack him, then these followers of the god of this world are angry and do everything to bring this new leader down. And the main means to achieve this, is to produce fake news in a big way.

A man, who has the guts to attack a man like Obama, must be a man, who seems to be crazy. A normal man would hardly attack a man, who goes for regime change in all places of the world, where there are people, who refuse to worship him, wo starts conflicts and wars, and suffering and refugee crises in a big style.

A man like this, who dares to do something about such a system of terror, must be an extraordinary person, who does not fit into the ideas men have of leaders.

It is like this man Yeltsin, an outspoken man, who took Russia out of the Soviet Union, and so brought down this system of terror, which terrorized the world of the 20th century. It is hardly imaginable that a sober man would have achieved something like this. It is hardly imaginable that a man who is sober is attempting to kill a thing like the Soviet Union.

Whenever Trump does or says something, the whole world comes down on him and denounces him. Half a century ago there was a similar situation. France had a leader and whenever he made a speech, the whole world condemned, what he had said, what he stood for, what he did, what his ideas were. And today the French people regard this man as the greatest leader they ever had.

Reasonable men always consider the media as court jesters, and when Trump depicts the media as a great evil, then he just expresses that, what is truth. And that it is what distinguishes him, that he denounces, what is wrong. That was the mistake, which Nixon did. He did not clearly denounce that, what he knew was wrong. He should have shown the Americans and the whole world, who really was and is their enemy. It was not the communists, the Vietcong, or Ho Chi Minh; the true enemy of the Americans and of the people of the whole world are those people in America, who themselves advance this communist thinking; the leaders of the Democratic Party and their followers and the leaders of the Republican Party, who think and act in the same direction, and there particularly such people like John McCain, who himself declared to the world, that there was something wrong with his head. These are the people, Trump attacks, and Nixon should have done exactly the same.

People who propagate atheism and materialism are causing all the problems of the world. People who fight God are the troublemakers.

Whether it will prove to be right to let such people run around freely, the future will show. The prophecies speak against it.

When someone like John McCain declares to the world, that there is something wrong with his head, then he proves by this, that the god of this world is his god, because he listens to this witch doctor, his physician. He leaves the surgery and explains to the world, what this stupid scientist says. He says, I am sick, and consequently contradicts God, who says, by Jesus Christ's stripes is John McCain healed.

And that is another proof that scientists are stupid. A real witch doctor knows what he is doing. What these so-called scientists, the physicians, at least some of them, do, is the same, what a witch doctor does, only that the witch doctor wants to harm and they apparently do not want to harm.

The universe according to quantum mechanics is probabilistic. Our life situation is probabilistic. The next life situation always depends on the decision we made in the previous one.

Was the decision wrong, then we are again put before a decision, which gives us the possibility to do right. If it was right, then we can progress, and that might be very fast. Within a life time, which is a very short time, a complete separation from the addiction to matter can be achieved. And that again requires basically just one decision, returning to God.

The microscopic and macroscopic worlds work like this: the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics reigns over the first.

The probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics reigns over the microscopic world. That is where the situations in the macroscopic world are created.

The probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics is the nature of the spiritual world. It, the spiritual world, is the world, where the physical world is planned and designed and thought out.

Let me repeat something from above:

Can a single macroscopic object be in two places at once? Could something the size of a pinhead, say, exist both here and there at the same time? That seemingly impossible condition is actually the norm for atoms, photons and all other particles. According to the surreal laws of quantum theory, reality at its most basic level defies our commonsense assumptions: Particles do not have fixed positions, energies or any other definite properties — at least while no one is looking. They exist in numerous states simultaneously. But for reasons physicists do not understand, the reality we see is different.

That is a description of the spiritual world. But that is also a testimony of one of the supporters of this religious system, the system of the materialists and of the atheists, that these people are stupid, without understanding.

Physicists are without understanding, stupid.

And just after that, another of such a testimony follows: Scientist have never understood why and how the universe crosses over between these realms.

There you have it in black and white that they are stupid. Coming from themselves.

"According to quantum mechanics, particles do not exist in definite states — here or there, having this energy or that — but rather take on all possible states and positions." They just wait to see what decision you are going to make.

The theory describes particles with equations called wave functions, which are combinations, or "superpositions," of multiple waves.

So what the spiritual realm is they call a wave function. And so they have created a word that is different from what all the people call it und therefore created one of the basics for their stupidity.

And now to the act of creation:

Strangely, when scientists make a measurement of a particle, this act appears to reduce all the quantum possibilities to one, seemingly chosen at random. The experiment will find the particle at point A, for example, and the particle enters the classical realm, ceasing to be in a superposition.

So they know exactly that there is no such thing like random, like chance.

The man enters the next stage in the classical realm. He ceases to be in superposition. He has made a decision, and now he heads for the next event.

The act of measurement was that he was given an opportunity to measure a situation, to measure, if it was something where he could do something good, and to then do it.

What does the act of measurement do?

One theory for how the universe crosses over from quantum to classical is that the act of measurement intervenes. Particles can linger in quantum superpositions (dotted yellow lines) as long as no one looks too closely, but once humans make a measurement, the particle is forced to "choose" a specific state (solid red lines). How this happens, and why human measurement should take on such a significance in physics, remains mystifying.

The act of measurement intervenes. When one looks too closely, then it is happening. Then the man is forced to "choose" a specific state.

When a man walks in the street, there might be birds on the pavement, or on the fence, or in the tree. They pay no attention to the man. But then the man suddenly has a direct look at one of the birds and immediately that bird reacts and is forced to choose a specific state. It might look back to see what this man is doing next. It might fly away or whatever.

When the man now carries on walking, there might be people, men, women, children. They pay no attention to the man. But when the man now suddenly has a direct look at, let us say, a woman, the woman reacts, and is forced to choose a specific state. She might look back, to see who is looking at her; she might ignore him, because she might have spent quite some time to learn to ignore such things; she might do something else, but a reaction follows.

Start to pay attention to such things, and quantum mechanics will become alive to you.

This is what life is all about. How do we react? What specific state do we adopt? Do we do good or bad?

We are given a chance to pass the test.

But these so-called scientists want to take the human aspect out of their equation and do not want to put two and two together to come to the obvious result.

And then comes again their admission: How this happens, and why human measurement should take on such a significance in physics, remains mystifying.

They are mystics: mystified.

And then one can also notice that eye contact is sometimes not even necessary in such situations, that a reaction results without it, and that is thought-transference. And thought-transference is the main aspect in quantum mechanics and thought-transference is a scientifically proven thing, proved by real scientists: Telepathy scientifically proven.

Actually since Heisenberg and since the knowledge that the very act of measurement has an effect, it is proven that telepathy exists. But even this fact they have failed to acknowledge.

To "make things happen" in quantum mechanics, one of the theory's legendary founders argued for an almost metaphysical hack. In the late 1920s Werner Heisenberg formulated and spread the notion that the very act of measurement makes the wave function of a particle "collapse" — the many potential outcomes instantaneously reduce to a single observed result.

For almost a century this quantum theory exists. Werner Heisenberg has explained it. It is a metaphysical thing. It is mysterious. It is the spiritual realm, the spiritual kingdom.

And then the writer writes that the physicists have gotten used to the collapse idea, but they have never liked it. They had the proof of the spiritual realm discovered and knew it, and because they want to fight God, the did not like it.

They found the most fundamental theory of how the universe works, and they turned against it.

And made fools out of themselves.

Physicists may have gotten used to the collapse idea over the past 90 years, but they have never really liked it. The notion that a human action — measurement — plays a central role in our most fundamental theory of how the universe works does not sit well with anyone partial to the concept of an objective reality.

And now this statement.

"Fundamentally, I have an ideal of what a physical theory should be," says Nobel laureate physicist Steven Weinberg of the University of Texas at Austin. (Weinberg serves on Scientific American's board of advisers.) "It should be something that doesn't refer in any specific way to human beings. It should be something from which everything else — including anything you can say systematically about chemistry, or biology, or human affairs — can be derived. It shouldn't have human beings at the beginning in the laws of nature. And yet I don't see any way of formulating quantum mechanics without an interpretive postulate that refers to what happens when people choose to measure one thing or another thing."

They want to take the human being out of the equation and therefore do not know, that the human being, or better the human soul, is the only thing that God really created, in his likeness, and that the physical world only exists, because these creatures, some of them, failed and had to undergo an imprisonment and a rehabilitation. And that is what this physical world is all about. To give us an opportunity to rescue us from this imprisonment, from this addiction to matter - to get us rehabilitated.

God only really created the soul, and that they do not want to accept, do not even want to accept its existence.

Here follows what a soul really is:

Composition of the soul. Miniature creation.

23. and 24. February 1950. B.D. NR. 4845.

The soul of man is an object of inconceivable many miniature creations. It is so to speak put together out of these creations, which all were its earlier embodiments, so that it is to be called a whole work of creation of God, who has proven in the human soul his infinite love, wisdom and omnipotence. Man cannot imagine it, that he holds the whole creation in his soul, but when he is able to see himself after his death in the spiritual kingdom, he will look at the miracle works full of reverence and love to God, which he finds again in himself. The soul substance is gathered from every embodiment during his course of development, and so the human soul in the individual substances has walked through the whole creation and has now to show an inconceivable versatility. (24.2.1950) Only then it will be apparent, how marvellous God’s works of creation are, and his greatness, his love, wisdom and omnipotence emerges so clearly and lets all entities remain in reverence and love to God, who makes his creatures immeasurably happy through becoming aware of his power and the recognition of him himself. But a certain degree of maturity belongs to it that the soul can see itself, and for that reason this is also a happiness of those, who are in the kingdom of light. The seeing of the soul is included in the promise of Jesus: “Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, the things which I have prepared for them that love me.” The soul can therefore see into all areas; it sees what it never seen before, but what is undeniably in existence in creation, and it is aware of it that these miracles are never at an end, that it again and again finds new objects and it still does not get tired of the seeing of these creations, but always wants to see more and consequently is also always more happy. The soul is something not perceptible for human senses and for that reason also not comprehensible. For men on earth it is something spiritual; but in the spiritual kingdom the essential thing; it is that what enlivens the spiritual creations; it is the truly living thing in the spiritual kingdom, because it is flowed through by the power of God. And so all thoughts of God find themselves in it again, which he let become form through his will power. Every work of creation is a manifested thought of God. And so the human soul is a work of creation of greatest extent in miniature version – but a doubtful idea for men on earth, a something, of which existence they are not yet completely convinced and can also research-wise never gain conviction. The soul is for earth men a nothing or a questionable object, but in truth the most marvellous creation testifying to God’s wisdom, love and omnipotence, which glorifies him in the spiritual kingdom, which is immortal and gives cause to permanent praise of God by all, who dwell in the kingdom of light and are happy. Amen. B.D. NR. 4845.

So the writer of this article "Crossing the Quantum Divide" in the Scientific American has given quite a nice description of quantum mechanics. But he is part of this sect of the materialists and of the atheists, and therefore part of this system of producers, who produce fake news.

This article ends on page 27 of the magazine, and on the next page, on page 28, we then find a real good example of fake news.

That next article starts with the heading: "Psychology - The Science of Anti-Science Thinking."

And then follows this:

Convincing people who doubt the validity of climate change and evolution to change their beliefs requires overcoming a set of ingrained cognitive biases

By Douglas T Kenrick, Adam B. Cohen, Steven L. Neuberg and Robert B. Cialdini

There are even details given about these 4 comedians:

23comic1 24comic2 25comic3 26comic4

So right in the first sentence we have the fake news these fake news producers are producing: the validity of evolution.

That is what it is all about with these comedians, trying to hang all their arguments on their so-called evidence of evolution. So let us have a look at some other statements of theirs.

Page 30
In public opinion surveys, a majority of Americans choose not to accept more than a century of evidence on evolution by natural selection.

A century of barrage of propaganda has left a majority of Americans unconvinced of so-called evidence on evolution by natural selection.

So the Americans are one of the few nations in the western world, actually the only one, which has not succumbed to the stupidity of the scientists.

They have just proved it recently again, when they rejected a continuation of the reign of terror of Obama.

They were able to break the hypnotizing of this man and free themselves from it.

Now another of their statements:

Page 30
Faced with irrational or tendentious opponents, scientists often grow increasingly strident.

And these scientists that grow increasingly strident are not the real scientists, but the so-called ones, because they know that their evidence is fake news. A real scientist has no need to grow strident, truth will always prove itself.

And now another one:

Page 30

Confirmation Bias. Even with ample time and sufficient interest to move beyond shortcuts, we sometimes process information in a manner less like an impartial judge and more like a lawyer working for the mob. We show a natural tendency to pay attention to some findings over others and to reinterpret mixed evidence to fit with preexisting beliefs.

Social Goals. Even if we surmount the first two obstacles, powerful forms of social motivation can interfere with an objective analysis of the facts at hand. Whether one is biased toward reaching one scientific conclusion versus another can be influenced by the desire to win status, to conform to the views of a social net-work or even to attract a mate.

This is a very nice description of these 4 guys of themselves. They work for the mob, the mob belonging to this sect of theirs, with the religious aim to fight God.

They have grown up in the system of education, which is completely controlled by the atheists and have been hypnotized into their so-called scientific beliefs and never ever thought about, delivering themselves from them. That thought never occurred to them.

Let us go to the next one:

Page 31
Although natural selection stands out as one of the most solidly supported scientific theories ever advanced, the average citizen has not waded through textbooks full of evidence on the topic.

That is what the members of this sect do. They say that their theory is true and because of that all the evidence speaking against it must be wrong and that is why there is no such evidence and cannot ever exist.

And when you have not waded through textbooks full of evidence on the topic, then you have not allowed yourselves to be hypnotized by them.

And when you have waded through all the evidence that exists proving that their theory is nonsense, and show it to them, then they label you as fake news producer.

A man can wade through all the evidence about the topic Marxism Leninism, which exists and apparently proves the theory is right. But he can also have a look at the history of the previous century, the counter evidence, and then knows that it is nonsense.

Here a link to just one of such evidences: Theory of evolution is statistically impossible

And now a second one: There are no coincidences

Page 32
So even if counterarguments can make it past our inner censors, we show an inclination to weigh those arguments in a very biased manner.

That is one of the examples these guys list trying to show where the thinking of people is wrong and which applies first of all to them themselves.

And still another one:

Page 33
If the human mind is built with so many obstacles to objective scientific thinking, should we just give up and accept that ignorance and bias will always triumph? Not at all.

So the solution is to not give up, but to keep the propaganda going and to produce fake news in always increasing manner.

So the Scientific American is a magazine that wants to create for itself the image of being a scientific magazine, but in reality it is propaganda organ of the sect of those who adhere to materialism and to atheism.

Their aim is to become the Joseph Gφbbels Prizewinner for fake news producers.

Page 3

DiChristina

 

Now still concluding remarks to quantum mechanics. It is now 90 years old, but since Werner Heisenberg nothing much has happened, and that because the scientists exclude the existence of the spiritual world from their so-called science, and that shows that it is not about scientists, because the man, who wants to exclude one area of life, and even the most important one, from his considerations, is a charlatan.

The scientists, the so-called ones, want to have nothing to do with spiritual things, and so 90 years have passed, and almost no progress has been made in quantum mechanics.

This is probably one of the nicest examples of the stupidity of scientists.

I repeat statements from above, where this ignorance is expressed:

But for reasons physicists do not understand, the reality we see is different.

Scientists have never understood why and how the universe crosses over between these realms, but several theories, as depicted here, offer possible explanations.

How this happens, and why human measurement should take on such a significance in physics, remains mystifying.

Heisenberg's "solution" essentially introduced a new mystery into physics: What exactly happens when a wave function collapses? That quantum conundrum is now known as the measurement problem.

For 90 years they now deal with questions, which existed already at the beginning of the discovery of quantum mechanics and have not progressed beyond it, and that only, because they want to hold on to their materialism and do not like all obvious solutions.

Now this subject of the relationship of quantum mechanics to the spiritual kingdom is a fascinating one and should be pursued.

Here now a link to a webpage that deals with his subject und where more links are found to the same subject:

The Seth material

 

And now links to other webpages related to this subject:

 

Quantum physics, the soul and extraterrestrial communication

The world of quanta

The quantum mechanics of time travel

The theory for everything

Weird relativity and quantum physics

 

Quantum physics. The reality that does not exist

The contradiction of scientists

Most scientists simply ignore this issue

Now that's what I call instant communication!

Spirit over matter

10

 

These dangerous comedians

Multiple universes

People education stupefying campaign

The mentally disturbed - the mad

Physics and psychology

 

Consciousness forms physical matter

String theory and quantum mechanics

Physics is conceptually unsettled

Consequences of quantum theory

String theory and SuSy

20

 

Quantum communication

Soul energy, individual particles, faster-than-light communication and consciousness

The simulation hypothesis

The importance of science

The collapse of the wave function actually means materialization

 

The blindness of scientists with the consequences of their researches

Extremely small particles can exist in two places at once

Entanglement exceeds time

Break with classical physics

Quantum mechanics makes «impossible» reactions possible

30

 

Astonishing experiment proves that Einstein was wrong

Physicists are schizophrenics

Quantum teleportation

Quantum theory and Jakob Lorber

 

And now links to other webpages on this website related to this subject:

 

The atheists

Forming out of spiritual original substances

Creationism and carnality

Waves

Quantum physics and consciousness

 

Energy forms matter

The all-embracing field of energy

Entanglement

The so-called scientists

 

When these fools of scientists would have given up their materialism and their atheism, then they could have been there decades ago, where Seth prophesied it to them.

And that is the discovery that consciousness forms physical matter.

See Difference of heavenly bodies:

And now a prophecy, for a change, from Seth, from 1965:

Not only that, it is simply a fact that your scientists will indeed discover, and no misty, magical superstition, that consciousness, of itself and because of its nature, forms physical matter. Because I once inhabited physical matter, as you all do know, does not mean that I am now some esoteric, occult creature of dim spiritualistic rather doubtful origins, who managed to invade gullible and neurotic consciousness.

But that consciousness forms physical matter is known since the very beginning. It is expressed in the very first statement of the book of books. In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. He first created the spiritual kingdom, heaven, and then he had to create the physical kingdom, earth, and that because of free will, which caused some of his creatures to use it in the wrong direction - to act like fools.

But God, a spirit being, used his consciousness to create, and so do we, spirit beings, use our consciousness to create all our circumstances, spiritual circumstances and physical circumstances. And that includes our bodies and our surroundings. And when we become aware of this, then we start to rule in life, and become masters of life, also able to overcome any kind of illness.

So quantum mechanics is a very powerful proof of the existence of God, and of the existence of God as creator.

 

 

This is the end of "2. Scientific American (1) July 2018".
To the German version of this chapter: 2. Scientific American (1) July 2018

 

 

Previous webpage:                 1. Der Standard (1) 25.08.2018    
To the beginning of this webpage: Beginning
Next webpage:                     3. Der Standard (2) 27.12.2017

[Home]>[Miscellaneous]>[9. The stupidity of scientists]>[2. Scientific American (1) July 2018]

[Home] [How to Measure Your Beliefs] [The Man-Made Church] [Miscellaneous]

The address of this webpage is:
http://www.fpreuss.com/en3/en04/en0402.htm