[Home] [How to Measure Your Beliefs] [The Man-Made Church] [Miscellaneous]

[Home]>[Miscellaneous]>[8. Astronomy]>[1. Astronomical questions and answers]>[Astronomical question and answer 232]

Previous webpage:           231
To the end of this webpage: End
Next webpage:               233

 

Astronomical question and answer 232

 

Frank L. Preuss

 

What is now the excuse of the scientists to stay away from spiritual things?

 

From Lyall Watson’s book "Lifetide," 1979, page 178:

One ends up always falling back on the idea of some sort of design in nature, which implies the existence of a Designer. That may be the final and perfectly reasonable solution, but it is a little embarrassing for a scientist because it is a theory incapable of refutation. As Karl Popper puts it, ‘Falsification, or refutability, is a criterion of the scientific status of a theory’. You have to be able to test a theory. You have to be able to prove that it is right or wrong. An explanation which explains everything, explains nothing. An explain-all is not more credible than a cure-all. Both are bad science and lousy logic.

All scientists are now very happy that one of them has found the right explanation, the right formulation, the right excuse, for them to stay away from any kind of dealings with the supernatural, with something, that cannot be proven.

What does Popper mean with falsification?

Here another quote:

POPPER, Sir Karl Raimund (1902- ), Austrian-born British philosopher, best known for his theory of falsification in the philosophy of science. Popper contends that scientific theories are never more than provisionally adopted and remain acceptable only as long as scientists are devising new experiments to test (falsify) them.

So he, Popper, is a scientist, exactly as all the others, who is part of the denomination of the atheists, and their belief is that they belief in materialism, and that matter is the only thing that really exists and everything else comes from matter, like consciousness is just the result of some processes taken place in matter. And because matter it everything, everything must also be proven by matter, by devices made out of matter, and therefore also being matter.

So when you are a scientist and someone calls you stupid, then just let the word Popper pop up in your mind and quote this word and your superiority has been proven.

Great minds have come out of Austria, but the only one worth reading is Jakob Lorber, and that one the others do not even know, but only reading his works will bring anything; he was the only one who looked inside and there he found truth.

I once read Rudolf Steiner, also a mind from Austria, but after I found Jakob Lorber and Bertha Dudde, Anthroposophy and Theosophy lost its attraction.

Lyall Watson says: "An explanation which explains everything, explains nothing. An explain-all is not more credible than a cure-all. Both are bad science and lousy logic."

There all his logic stops, for a cure-all would indeed be the proof that it is something explaining everything, and be exactly the opposite of lousy logic, but excellent logic.

They simply do not want to do good. They are against it. The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.

It is a powerful story how God, once again, revealed himself to Lyall Watson. Read it: Lyall Watson 4.

But how can one say that a man like Lyall Watson does not want to do good?

If he wanted to do good, then he had learned, by quite a number of examples, how to do good, to do it God's way. To do it the way, God wants it done. And this was shown to him by men, who he could have taken as examples. He had no excuse. He, through his books, has proven to himself and to thousands of people, that God is. This business of wanting to be able to prove something, to test something, is just a means to cover up their whole evil intention to fight God.

Why is it then so important not to fight God?

Because God is everything. There is nothing outside of God. Everything, everything spiritual and everything material, everything together is God. When now someone, who is also part of this everything, fights this everything, then he is like a cancer cell, which fights the everything, therefore also itself. And that is something stupid. And therefore this denigrating of such cancer cells as fools is completely justified, and even not enough, for one also must call such cancer cells that what they are also, good-for-nothings.

Lyall Watson says: "An explanation which explains everything, explains nothing. An explain-all is not more credible than a cure-all. Both are bad science and lousy logic."

Here we have it, what it is all about with Lyall Watson, an explanation, which explains everything is and remains God, and such an explanation is not allowed to exist for an atheist and materialist und war has to be waged against it, and so he proofs to Lyall Watson, and also to all others, that he is no scientist, but merely a member of a religious sect, which supports its own theology and has very little to do with science. And consequently he is a fool and evil and a cancer cell.

If he would have been a genuine scientist then he would have explained all the experiences that he had in such a way, that he would have explained to the reader the spiritual back ground of the happenings, which would have been quite easy and simple. But since he had no knowledge about them, despite calling himself a person of knowledge, he was baffled by them and the one whole affair was shattering for him. It was years before he even brought himself to talk of it.

When he would have been a genuine scientist, then he would have explained all the experiences, which he had had, in such a way that he had explained to the reader the spiritual backgrounds of the happenings; what would have been quite simple and easy. But since he had no knowledge about it, despite of calling himself a scientist, therefore someone, who has knowledge, he was baffled and one whole affair was shattering for him. He needed years before he even brought himself to talk of it.

And here you have a nice example, why scientists belong to the most stupid people among us men, because they have spend much more time exposing themselves to the educational system of the atheists and the materialists, than the normal man. The other men around Lyall Watson had much less problems getting to grips with that, what they experienced, and that, because they were very much less indoctrinated by the false prophets.

We have just said that it would have been quite easy and simple to explain to the reader the spiritual background of the happenings. And that one can find in quite normal libraries. Here on this website there exist examples of such explanations. Here is one: de251. But why are these explanations not know to the knowing? Because they are not allowed to read them. That is not allowed in their sect, is forbidden there. And so they are and remain stupid. Have a look at the titles before and after the name of a scientist. From the number of titles one can directly conclude to the degree of their stupidity.

 

This is the end of "Astronomical question and answer 232"
To the German version of this chapter: Astronomische Frage und Antwort 232

 

 

Previous webpage:                 231    
To the beginning of this webpage: Beginning
Next webpage:                     233

[Home]>[Miscellaneous]>[8. Astronomy]>[1. Astronomical questions and answers]>[Astronomical question and answer 232]

[Home] [How to Measure Your Beliefs] [The Man-Made Church] [Miscellaneous]

The address of this webpage is:
http://www.fpreuss.com/en3/en03/en0320/en03232.htm